"The spontaneous occurrence of a novel prion strain that is the same in 14 individuals in the UK over the last two years seems extraordinarily unlikely as an explanation for NV-CJD. The alternative conclusion is that these cases have arisen from a common source of exposure to a new prion strain, the lack of any history of common iatrogenic exposure indicates that this is a new animal strain." Collinge et al, Nature 383: 685-690,1996.
In this paper they described the first direct evidence that BSE is the cause of NV-CJD. They found that PrPsc isolated from 10 cases of NV-CJD all had an identical 'fingerprint' on SDS polyacrylamide gels. This fingerprint was quite distinct from that seen in cases of familial, sporadic and iatrogenic CJD. However it was identical to the fingerprint found in BSE strains isolated from several animal species. Strain typing experiments currently in progress will be necessary to confirm this result but I think we can now answer the above question with a Yes.
Conservative(?) assumption 1 beef meal per week for 12 years with a 3% chance of the beef being infected = 500 x 0.03 = 18 independent exposures.
Whatever the risk of infection, it is additive.
Some claim 1010 LD50/g wet tissue by the intracerebral (i.c.) route. Most agree 107 by the i.c. route in scrapie. Unpublished reports suggest 107 in BSE. Most of the infected animals will have been incubating the disease and have had a titre lower than 107. But some will have had full blown BSE and titres approaching 107.
Assuming that of the 18 exposures 1 was major, (beefburger, pate, your favourite meat pie, pastrami, cows brain!) cooking will have done little to reduce the titre. 10g@ 107 = 108 ic LD50 eaten.
1 gastric LD50 = 100,000 i.c. LD50 (measured by comparing BSE titres in mice) i.e. 103 or 1,000 gastric LD50.
Unless these assumptions are badly flawed, it seems reasonable to assume that most of us have been exposed to an enormous infectious BSE prion dose. In which case we have to thank the powers that be for the species barrier
| Species Barrier: | Effective LD50: | Deaths: |
|---|---|---|
| 104 | 10-1 | 2.5 million |
| 105 | 10-2 | 250,000 |
| 106 | 10-3 | 25,000 |
| 107 | 10-4 | 2,500 |
| 108 | 10-5 | 250 |
Other risk factors include the PrP 129 polymorphism. For the Caucasian population:
The relative Sporadic CJD Risk for these genotypes is 11 : 4 : 1.
For growth hormone iatrogenic CJD it is 50% V/V, 31%M/M and 19% M/V.
So far 100% of NV-CJD patients have had a M/M genotype.
Worst case scenario:
Current infections are fast responders to early 1980s infections when even retrospectively we can't see BSE in the national heard. By 1992, cattle infections were increased by more than 1000 fold. This would imply that we will see at least tens of thousands of human cases.
Best case scenario:
Current cases are the sensitive responders to the peak of the BSE epidemic in 1989-93. This would imply only a few hundred deaths.
For an alternative view, read: Cousens SN. et al.
Predicting the CJD epidemic in humans. Nature 385: 197-8 (1997).
